Case 1405937/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v The hearing was conducted by video conference (CVP) . and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405937/2020
- Decision date
- 5 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
3 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 31 August 2021 was a remedy-only hearing conducted by CVP before Employment Judge Rayner, following a liability judgment by Employment Judge Dawson dated 28 May 2021. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was entitled to be paid for 36 hours of work at £8.50 per hour, and ordered the respondent to pay £306 gross.
The tribunal also awarded £1,000 for injury to feelings in respect of sex discrimination. The total sum payable to the claimant was £1,306.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Remedy judgment following a liability judgment dated 28 May 2021; the claimant was awarded £306 gross for 36 hours at £8.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £306 |
| Sex discrimination | Remedy judgment following a liability judgment dated 28 May 2021; the tribunal awarded £1,000 for injury to feelings in respect of sex discrimination. | Upheld | Sex | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,306
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £306
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.