Case 1405961/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Adorisio v Ribston Hall High School — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405961/2019
- Decision date
- 8 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Adorisio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Adorisio brought claims of unfair dismissal and age discrimination against Ribston Hall High School. Following a preliminary hearing on 27/07/2020, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £700, allocated as £350 in respect of each claim, and the order was sent to her on 13/08/2020.
The claimant did not pay the deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out both the age discrimination complaint and the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 24/09/2020 and 15-17/03/2021 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out after the claimant failed to pay a £350 deposit ordered in respect of this claim following a preliminary hearing on 27/07/2020. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Struck out after the claimant failed to pay a £350 deposit ordered in respect of this claim following a preliminary hearing on 27/07/2020. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.