Case 1405968/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Gonsalves v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1405968/2019
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Gonsalves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's application for interim relief at a hearing in Bristol on 18 December 2019.
Employment Judge Midgley found that it was not likely that, when determining the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal would find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was that the claimant was a health and safety representative or had carried out health and safety activities. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, with written reasons available only if requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment adjudicated the claimant's application for interim relief, not the underlying unfair dismissal claim. The application was dismissed because the tribunal found it was not likely that, on determining the unfair dismissal claim, it would find the reason or principal reason for dismissal was that the claimant was a health and safety representative or carried out health and safety activities. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.