Case 1406008/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Szarecki v Caring Homes Healthcare Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406008/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Szarecki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Reed sat alone in Southampton on 14 and 15 September 2020. The tribunal held that Mr R Szarecki was not unfairly dismissed and that Caring Homes Healthcare Group Ltd did not make unauthorised deductions from his wages.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a written itemised pay statement. It directed the respondent to pay £300.74 in relation to that finding. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent did not make unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a written itemised pay statement and ordered payment of £300.74. | Upheld | — | £301 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £301
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.