Case 1406016/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Clark v Wrights Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406016/2019
- Decision date
- 6 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Wrights Group Ltd was in administration and that neither the consent of the Administrator nor permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On that basis, the tribunal said the claim could not proceed.
The tribunal also noted that on 11 June 2020 it had given Mr S Clark an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide any reason in response.
In light of those two matters, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no determination on the substantive merits of the underlying employment claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it records only that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in administration and the required consent/permission had not been obtained, and because the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's opportunity to give written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.