Case 1406026/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Chapman, Solicitor For the First v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406026/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Chapman, Solicitor For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, heard in chambers at Plymouth on 31 August 2021 before Employment Judge N J Roper, records that the claimant withdrew two claims. Those were the claim for automatically unfair dismissal for health and safety reasons against both respondents, and the claim for automatically unfair dismissal on the grounds of protected public interest disclosures against the second respondent only.
The tribunal dismissed both claims on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment states that this did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were said to be dealt with in the Case Management Summary of the same date. The judgment was sent to the parties on 15 September 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Automatically unfair dismissal for health and safety reasons against both respondents; the judgment states these claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Automatically unfair dismissal on the grounds of having made protected public interest disclosures against the second respondent only; the judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.