Case 1406055/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Chering v Trios Compliance Ltd Heard by Cloud Video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406055/2020
- Decision date
- 12 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Chering
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by Cloud Video on 24 September 2021 before Employment Judge Reed, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the claimant’s claim was not presented to the tribunal in time.
The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The judgment records that there was no order as to costs. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written judgment being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal found the claim was not presented to the tribunal in time and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.