Case 1406060/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Smith v Randstad Technologies Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406060/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Christensen Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 March 2021, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, because the claimant was not entitled to bring that claim due to being employed by the respondent for less than two years. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim was unaffected by this decision. No financial remedy was assessed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 19 March 2021 to make representations or request a hearing. It found the claimant had failed to make written representations, or any sufficient representations, and that he was not entitled to bring the claim because he had been employed for less than two years. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.