Case 1406069/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nathan Kedem v Commercial and Industrial Lighting Solutions Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1406069/2023
- Decision date
- 26 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hay Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nathan Kedem
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Nathan Kedem brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Commercial and Industrial Lighting Solutions Ltd. The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in the period between August 2023 and January 2024.
The judgment record does not contain written reasons because the reasons were given orally at the hearing. On the basis recorded in the written judgment, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £3,568.41, described as the net sum deducted.
That sum was comprised of £2,689.14 in unpaid wages and £879.27 in unpaid expenses.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period August 2023 to January 2024. The award comprised £2,689.14 in unpaid wages and £879.27 in unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £3,568 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,568
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.