Case 1406091/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Gilmour v Mr B Jenkin Mrs E Jenkin Mr I Jenkin T/A Cornwall Signs (a firm) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406091/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms S Maidment, Mr H Launder
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Gilmour
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs H Gilmour was unfairly dismissed by Mr B Jenkin, Mrs E Jenkin and Mr I Jenkin trading as Cornwall Signs. The written judgment records a single liability finding and also states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply to the case.
At remedy, the parties had agreed a total award of £1,376.68 for the unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal recorded no basic award because the claimant had received a redundancy payment. The compensatory award was broken down as £905.44 for four weeks’ loss of earnings, £21.24 for four weeks’ loss of employer pension contributions, and £450 for loss of statutory rights, producing a total compensatory award and grand total of £1,376.68.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant. It also stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply. | Upheld | — | £1,377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,377
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,377
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.