Case 1406096/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Ineson, Claimant’s Partner For the v Mr J French-Williams, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406096/2019
- Decision date
- 5 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Ineson, Claimant’s Partner For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in chambers at Plymouth on 5 May 2020 before Employment Judge N J Roper, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims were dismissed because they were withdrawn by the claimant. No substantive determination was made on either of those claims.
The judgment states that this disposal did not affect the claimant's remaining claims of discrimination and harassment on the grounds of sex, which were dealt with separately in the attached Case Management Summary. Those claims were not finally determined in this judgment.
No monetary award was made in this judgment, and no remedy figures are recorded. The judgment therefore functions only as a withdrawal disposal for the unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims, with the sex discrimination and harassment allegations left outstanding.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.