Case 1406112/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Regos v Keystonecare — 2024
- Case reference
- 1406112/2023
- Decision date
- 13 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Regos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter at Southampton by video on 21 June 2024 before Employment Judge Gray. The claimant, Mr I Regos, appeared in person and the respondent, Keystonecare, was represented by Mr Keogh, described as a director of Keystone Management Solutions Ltd.
The written judgment records that the claim was dismissed because it was withdrawn by the claimant. No substantive findings on the merits are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
The judgment also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal note attached to the decision. The record was dated 21 June 2024 and sent to the parties on 13 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states: 'The claim is dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.' The extracted text does not identify separate causes of action, so the claim is recorded as a withdrawn claim of unspecified type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.