Case 1406114/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Burns v Hospitality Accommodation Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406114/2020
- Decision date
- 8 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Burns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Bristol on 18 August 2021, before Employment Judge Livesey, the tribunal found that Miss S Burns had been unfairly dismissed by Hospitality Accommodation Ltd. It awarded a basic award of £1,464.86 and a compensatory award of £223.22, making £1,688.08 in total, and noted that the recoupment provisions apply.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed without notice and awarded compensation of £837.06 for that claim. In addition, it awarded unpaid holiday pay of £455.30. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal said the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £1,464.86 and a compensatory award of £223.22, total £1,688.08. Recoupment provisions apply. | Upheld | — | £1,688 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal said the claimant was dismissed without notice and awarded compensation of £837.06. | Upheld | — | £837 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded unpaid holiday pay of £455.30. | Upheld | — | £455 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,980
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,465
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £223
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.