Case 1406149/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Baker of Counsel For the v Mr J Hoskins, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406149/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Baker of Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the chambers hearing on 28 July 2020 before Employment Judge N J Roper, the tribunal dealt only with the claimant's religion and belief discrimination claim in this judgment. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew that claim, and it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal noted that this dismissal did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were dealt with separately in the attached case management summary of the same date. No remedy, findings on liability beyond the withdrawal, or monetary award are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for discrimination on the grounds of religion and belief was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment also records that this did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were to be addressed in the attached case management summary. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.