Case 1406152/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Brown v Benjamin’s Bar and Bistro Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1406152/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss G Brown presented her claim in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 7 December 2023. The respondent, Benjamin’s Bar and Bistro Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Midgley determined that judgment could properly be entered under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,274 gross in respect of that claim. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £875.28 for that element.
The total awarded was £2,149.28. The judgment records no separate award of interest or other remedy and does not identify any further issues beyond the two monetary claims decided on the papers.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £1,274 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £875 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,149
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.