Case 1406173/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Dixon v Belgarum Property Management Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1406173/2023
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leverton Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Dixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim of Miss G Dixon against Belgarum Property Management Limited over three days in May 2025, sitting at Southampton and then by CVP, before Employment Judge Leverton sitting alone. The judgment records that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed, while the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was well-founded and succeeded. A further complaint regarding the duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars was determined in the respondent's favour, the tribunal finding that the respondent was not in breach of that duty when the proceedings were begun.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £39,495.11. This was broken down into compensation for past financial losses of £7,491.29 (covering loss of sick pay in 2018 and 2019 and loss of interest after pension drawdown in 2021), interest on those past financial losses of £1,198.34 calculated under the Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996, compensation for injury to feelings of £20,000, and interest on the injury to feelings award of £10,805.48 calculated under the same Regulations.
Written reasons were not provided with this judgment, as reasons were given orally at the hearing; the document notes that written reasons will be issued only on request within the prescribed period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of direct disability discrimination found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability (s.15 EqA-type claim) was well-founded and succeeded. The total award of £39,495.11 attaches to this successful claim. | Upheld | Disability | £39,495 |
| Other | Complaint regarding the written statement of employment particulars: the tribunal found that when proceedings were begun, the respondent was not in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £39,495
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £7,491
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.