Case 1406201/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Bonmarche Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406201/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the complaint that Bonmarche Limited (In Administration) failed to comply with the requirement in section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The respondent did not attend the hearing. The judgment records that this complaint was well founded.
As a remedy, the tribunal made a protective award for Head Office staff employed at the respondent’s premises in Jubilee Way, Grange Moor, Wakefield who were dismissed as redundant on or after 29 October 2019. The respondent was ordered to pay those employees remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 29 October 2019. The judgment does not set out a separate monetary figure for Mr Clarke individually or a total monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal upheld a complaint of failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award. The judgment does not state an individual monetary sum for the claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.