Case 1406241/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wendon v WBW Solicitors LLP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406241/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wendon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment relates only to the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages. Following a preliminary hearing on 10 August 2022, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £400, and the order was sent on 16 August 2022.
The claimant did not pay the deposit. On that basis, Employment Judge Bax struck out the unlawful deduction of wages complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the remaining claims were to proceed to the hearing starting on 31 January 2022. No substantive findings on the merits of the struck-out claim, and no monetary award, are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £400 following a preliminary hearing on 10 August 2022. The deposit order was sent on 16 August 2022, but the claimant failed to pay it, so the unlawful deduction of wages complaint was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.