Case 1406253/2019 · Employment Tribunal
1) Miss T Bailey 2) Miss S Guy 3) Ms A Kerr v Little Paws Nursery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406253/2019
- Decision date
- 7 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1) Miss T Bailey 2) Miss S Guy 3) Ms A Kerr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in the cases of Miss T Bailey, Miss S Guy and Ms A Kerr against Little Paws Nursery Ltd, under case numbers 1406253/2019, 1406254/2019 and 1406255/2019. The judgment records that the tribunal was using the standard Rule 21 template and that Employment Judge Rayner signed it on 4 February 2020.
The tribunal stated that the claims succeed. It did not set out the underlying liability findings in the extracted text, and it did not specify any remedy at this stage. Instead, it recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, with notice to be sent to the parties in due course.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment. The extracted text does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action; it states only that 'the claims succeed' and that remedy will be dealt with at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.