Case 1406267/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did Not Attend For the v Mr A Passman — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406267/2019
- Decision date
- 20 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did Not Attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Stacey brought a monetary claim against Stay Dry Roofing (South West) Limited for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal recorded that the agreed gross holiday entitlement at termination was £900.00, equivalent to £654.82 net after tax and National Insurance. The respondent relied on clause 7 of the contract, signed by the claimant on 22 December 2014, which authorised deductions from wages for outstanding loans and for damage or repairs caused by the employee’s negligence.
The tribunal found that the claimant had used the company van late at night and in the early hours of the morning despite being told to stop, had resigned on 29 October 2019, and had left the van abandoned with the tracker wire cut. The respondent had incurred £97.00 for an engineer’s assessment and £195.00 to repair the tracker damage, and it had also issued clothing and tools totalling £476.03, which the tribunal described as effectively advanced as a loan. A letter of 30 October 2019 stated that those sums would be deducted from the claimant’s final pay.
Applying section 13 ERA 1996, the tribunal held that the deductions were not unlawful because the claimant had previously signified in writing his agreement or consent to them. It found the sums deducted from the net holiday pay fell within the contractual deduction clause and therefore extinguished the net amount otherwise due. The claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was dismissed.
The judgment also noted a dispute about paternity pay, but stated that those matters were outside the scope of the proceedings and were not addressed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned accrued but untaken holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal held the deductions from the final net sum were authorised by clause 7 of the contract and fell within section 13(1)(b) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 13(1)(b) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.