Case 1406271/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Rascals After School Club Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1406271/2023
- Decision date
- 20 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued in chambers at Plymouth on 20 December 2024 under rule 22 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The claimant was Deborah Pine and the respondent was Rascals After School Club Limited.
The tribunal held that Ms Pine was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,185.25. The award was calculated as 5 weeks x 1.5 at £157.50 gross per week.
The tribunal also recorded that any claim for accrued holiday pay and/or breach of contract in respect of notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No separate monetary award was made for that claim head in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded, calculated as 5 weeks x 1.5 at £157.50 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £1,185 |
| Other | The judgment states that any claim for accrued holiday pay and/or breach of contract in respect of notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; treated here as a composite claim because the text does not separate the heads. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,185
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.