Case 1406281/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Representing himself For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406281/2020
- Decision date
- 14 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Panel members
- Mrs Blake, Mr Ley
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Representing himself For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Southampton by CVP on 4 March 2022 before Employment Judge Dawson, Mrs Blake and Mr Ley. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written record states that the claimant's claims were dismissed.
No written reasons are included in the extracted record because the judgment was given orally at the hearing and the tribunal notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the material available here, the decision records the outcome but does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or legal analysis.
The case listing identifies race discrimination and unfair dismissal as the relevant categories, and the outcome recorded for the case is dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment record states that the claimant's claims were dismissed. No separate reasoning or remedy is set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The gov.uk listing category for the case identifies race discrimination, but the extracted judgment text does not set out separate reasons in this record. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.