Case 1406311/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Selby (lay representative) For the v Evolution Eco Homes Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406311/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Lumby Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Selby (lay representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was held remotely by VHS on 29 April 2022 before Employment Judge H Lumby. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal found for the claimant, Mr Michael Randall, on all three heads of claim.
It held that the claimant's claim for breach of contract succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay three days' pay in the gross sum of £590.55. It also held that the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded in respect of accrued but unpaid holiday pay and accrued but unpaid statutory sick pay.
The amounts ordered were £120.90 for holiday pay and £38.34 for statutory sick pay. The judgment records no separate liability analysis beyond those outcomes and no additional remedy such as interest or injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered payment of three days' pay in the gross sum of £590.55. | Upheld | — | £591 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of accrued but unpaid holiday pay in the gross sum of £120.90. | Upheld | — | £121 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of accrued but unpaid statutory sick pay in the gross sum of £38.34. | Upheld | — | £38 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.