Case 1406318/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Teagann v Aurea Search Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406318/2019
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Teagann
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Teagann was employed by Aurea Search Limited from 29 January 2019 as Head of People. Her pay later increased so that her take-home pay was £1,541 per month, and her contract also provided for unlimited annual leave and a bonus package linked to gross profit. She brought claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, pension contributions and a bonus payment. The pension contribution claim was withdrawn before the hearing and the bonus payment claim was withdrawn during the hearing.
The tribunal found that the employment relationship had not ended in December 2019 or at the meeting on 6 January 2020. It accepted the claimant's evidence and the contemporaneous text messages showing that the parties were still discussing wages and future working arrangements after that meeting. The tribunal found that the meeting on 6 January was not an exit interview, that the claimant had not resigned, and that the respondent had not terminated the contract in writing at that stage. It also found that the claimant was still employed until 14 February 2020, although she did no work in January and February after access to her work email was removed on 9 January.
On the wages claim, the tribunal held that the claimant should have been paid £1,541 for December 2019 but received £900, leaving £641 outstanding. It found that there was no written agreement authorising that deduction. For January and February 2020, the tribunal accepted that there had been an agreement in principle to reduce the claimant's role to three days per week, so it assessed her entitlement on a pro rata basis at £924.60 per month. The respondent paid nothing for those two months, so the tribunal found unlawful deductions of £924.60 for January and £924.60 for February.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,490.20 in respect of the unlawful deductions from wages. No separate remedy was awarded for the withdrawn pension contribution or bonus claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was partly well founded. The tribunal found an unlawful deduction of £641 from December 2019 wages and non-payment of £924.60 for January 2020 and £924.60 for February 2020. | Upheld | — | £2,490 |
| Other | The claim in respect of pension contributions was withdrawn prior to the hearing; the judgment records that the claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claim in respect of the bonus payment was withdrawn during the hearing; the judgment records that the claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,490
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.230(3) ERA 1996
- s.27(1) ERA 1996
- Delaney v Staples [1992] IRLR 191, HL
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.13(1)(b) ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- s.14 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.