Case 1406336/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Gillard v Dimensions Somerset SEV Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406336/2019
- Decision date
- 1 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Gillard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing in Bristol by Cloud Video Platform on 1 June 2020. The tribunal held that the claimant's claims were presented outside the relevant statutory time limit and that she had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to present them in time. Those claims were dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was in breach of contract. On the respondent's counterclaim, and in the absence of a response, Employment Judge Livesey entered judgment in default for £5,763.87.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was commenced outside the relevant statutory time limit and the claimant did not show that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed because the claim was commenced outside the relevant statutory time limit and the claimant did not show that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was in breach of contract and entered judgment in default on the respondent's counterclaim for £5,763.87. | Upheld | — | £5,764 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,764
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.