Case 1406338/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Axiom Ince Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1406338/2023
- Decision date
- 18 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr D. Hawkins-Crockford was constructively unfairly dismissed by Axiom Ince Limited (in Administration) on 22 September 2023. The respondent did not appear at the hearing.
The respondent was ordered to pay compensation of GBP 5,389.65 within 14 days. The award was made up of a basic award of GBP 1,929.00, loss of earnings, also described as failure to pay notice, of GBP 2,960.65, and GBP 500.00 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment states that it does not address any claim for a 2023 performance bonus, which the claimant may pursue as a breach of contract claim in the County Court if so advised.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed. It also states that the claim does not address any 2023 performance bonus claim. | Upheld | — | £5,390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,390
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,929
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,461
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.