Case 1406344/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Royale Group OPCO Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1406344/2023
- Decision date
- 8 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the Claimant's claim that the Respondent failed to inform and consult with her regarding a TUPE transfer which took effect on 14 July 2023 was well founded and succeeded. The hearing took place at Southampton Employment Tribunal on 16 August 2024 before Employment Judge Rayner, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent not in attendance (recorded as RNR).
The tribunal awarded the Claimant the sum of £5,624.97, calculated as 13 weeks at a gross weekly pay of £432.69. The Respondent was ordered to pay this sum to the Claimant.
Reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the sending of the record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Failure to inform and consult regarding TUPE transfer effective 14 July 2023. Award calculated as 13 weeks x gross pay of £432.69. Respondent did not attend (RNR). | Upheld | — | £5,625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.