Case 1406347/2019 · Employment Tribunal
- NO ATTENDANCE FOR THE v - Mr R Campbell — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406347/2019
- Decision date
- 15 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Salter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- NO ATTENDANCE FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims of unfair dismissal and unpaid holiday pay on 19 December 2019. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on 30 January 2020 because the claimant had less than two years' service and the tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The holiday pay claim came on for hearing on 15 May 2020 and was later relisted by CVP video link. The claimant did not attend the final hearing. The tribunal recorded that, because there was no primary evidence before it, the claimant had not proved that any holiday pay was owed and the claim was dismissed on that evidential ground alone.
In any event, the tribunal considered the parties' competing positions on the merits. It accepted that the employment ended on 4 September 2019, but noted that the respondent paid the claimant up to the end of September 2019. Even if the claimant's case were accepted, including an assumption that she had taken no holiday and was owed eight days' pro rata holiday pay, the tribunal held that the September payment meant she had not been underpaid at termination. The holiday pay claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on 30 January 2020 because the claimant had less than two years' service, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing and produced no primary evidence that holiday pay was owed; the tribunal also held that, even on the claimant's best case, the final payment covered any untaken holiday entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.