Case 1406357/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hodgson v Verwood Electrical — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406357/2019
- Decision date
- 3 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hodgson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 April 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr Hodgson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out on the grounds that it had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or any underlying employment rights issue are recorded in the judgment text provided. The decision is dated 3 June 2020 and is signed by Employment Judge Roper.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It records that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the Tribunal's 30 April 2020 letter about no reasonable prospect of success and failure to pursue the claim actively. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.