Case 1406373/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Philip Beach v Angelfish (Southampton) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406373/2020
- Decision date
- 28 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gibb Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Philip Beach
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written record for the hearing on 17 February 2022 states that Employment Judge Gibb determined the effective date of termination of the claimant's employment to be 25 August 2020. The document also records that the email dated 10 August 2020 was admissible at trial.
The remainder of the document is a case management order. It lists the matter for a telephone case management hearing with a one-hour time estimate and directs the parties' representatives to agree a list of issues and an agenda to be filed with the Tribunal at least seven days before that hearing. The extracted text does not contain a final substantive determination of the pleaded employment claims or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text does not record a substantive determination of any pleaded claim. It records a ruling that the effective date of termination was 25 August 2020 and that the email dated 10 August 2020 was admissible at trial, followed by a case management order. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.