Case 1406422/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S de Lacey, Solicitor For the v Mr M Stevens, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1406422/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S de Lacey, Solicitor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a chambers hearing in Plymouth on 27 August 2020, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded that the claimant's claims for indirect discrimination on the grounds of disability and for unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment states that this did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were to continue as explained in the attached case management summary of the same date.
The decision is limited to procedural disposal of those two claims. No findings are made in this judgment on the merits of the discrimination or wages allegations, and no remedy was awarded in respect of the dismissed claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for indirect discrimination on the grounds of disability was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.