Case 1406426/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Aiken v The Duke of Connaught’s Own Club (Fareham) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406426/2020
- Decision date
- 13 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Aiken
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Aiken’s claim of unfair dismissal succeeded. The judgment states that the claim was well-founded and that it succeeded, but it does not set out any detailed findings on the dismissal facts or reasoning in the extracted text provided.
The parties agreed the compensation payable to the claimant in respect of the unfair dismissal. The agreed sum was £1,777.76. No separate basic award, interest figure, or other remedy component is identified in the judgment text provided.
The case was heard at Southampton on 22 and 23 November 2021 before Employment Judge Self, sitting alone. The judgment was sent to the parties on 13 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal declared the unfair dismissal claim well-founded and recorded that the parties agreed compensation of £1,777.76. | Upheld | — | £1,778 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,778
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,778
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.