Case 1406433/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1406433/2020
- Decision date
- 31 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mrs C Date, Mr J Ruddick
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton, Employment Judge Rayner sitting with Mrs C Date and Mr J Ruddick heard Miss Ana Lucia Goncalves Dias's claims against Advance Housing and Support on 16, 17 and 18 May 2023. The tribunal found that she had been wrongfully dismissed and was entitled to four weeks' notice pay, and it also found an unlawful deduction from wages. It dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim and dismissed each of her Equality Act 2010 discrimination claims.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,728.12 net for the notice period, recording a gross figure of £2,216.64. In relation to the wages claim, it found a gross deduction of £1,750.00, noted that £1,275.64 had already been paid, and ordered payment of the remaining £474.36. The total amount payable was therefore £2,202.48. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed and entitled to 4 weeks' notice pay; the remedy section records a gross figure of £2,216.64 and a net payment of £1,728.12. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages of £1,750.00 gross. It recorded that £1,275.64 had already been paid and ordered the remaining balance of £474.36. | Upheld | — | £474 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The extracted judgment text dismisses each Equality Act claim without specifying the individual ground; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Victimisation | The extracted judgment text dismisses each Equality Act claim without specifying the individual ground; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,202
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.