Case 1406448/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Knight v Mitie FM Limited, formerly Interserve (Facilities Management) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406448/2020
- Decision date
- 25 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Knight
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 September 2021, the Tribunal gave Ms Knight an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing before strike out. The stated grounds were that she had failed to comply with an order requiring her by 26 April 2021 to provide medical evidence and a disability impact statement, contrary to rule 37(1)(c), and that she was not actively pursuing the claim, contrary to rule 37(1)(d), because she did not attend the hearing on 25 August 2021, gave no indication of her intentions, and did not reply to correspondence from the Respondent.
Ms Knight did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type(s); it records that 'the claim' was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.