Case 1406467/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Leslie v Ssangyong Motor UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406467/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Leslie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 14 May 2021, Employment Judge Midgley issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss N Leslie against Ssangyong Motor UK Ltd. The judgment states that the claim succeeds, but it does not record the substantive basis of liability in the extracted text.
The tribunal did not fix any remedy in this decision. Instead, it said that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a separate remedy hearing.
The case was listed for a two-hour remedy hearing, with notice to be sent out in due course. The judgment was sent to the parties on 18 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying legal label of the claim. It states only that, under Rule 21, 'The claim succeeds' and that remedy will be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.