Case 1406488/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Gibbons v Electric Bear Brewing Company Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406488/2020
- Decision date
- 6 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper’s
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms L Gibbons
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the Deposit Order. The reasons say this was following correspondence sent to the parties on 25 August 2021 and that the judgment was issued on the basis of non-payment of the deposit under Employment Judge Roper's order of 12 August 2021.
The hearing listed for 9 November 2021 did not take place. The tribunal did not determine the merits of the claim and gave no findings on the substantive allegations.
On the material supplied, the case involved claims for sex discrimination and unfair dismissal, but the judgment records only the procedural strike-out outcome and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Deposit Order. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Deposit Order. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.