Case 1406558/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dean Blanch v Synapsia Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406558/2020
- Decision date
- 23 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dean Blanch
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Blanch had worked for Synapsia Ltd for a little over eight years, on £1,000 basic pay plus commission that took his average monthly earnings to £2,881. After the first lockdown, schools remained closed for most of the relevant period, Mr Thwaites was furloughed, and when Mr Blanch returned to work in late August 2020 the relationship deteriorated over how sales calls should be made. The tribunal found that the initial dismissal on 3 September 2020, the later purported resignation, and the later conduct dismissal were all pretexts.
The tribunal found that the real reason for dismissal was redundancy driven by the respondent's financial position during Covid, with Mr Thwaites deciding that Mr Blanch had to go and that his work would be done by Mr Thwaites's wife. No other salesperson was recruited, and Mrs Thwaites took over Mr Blanch's client book. On that basis the tribunal awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £5,318.77, a compensatory award of £1,329.69, notice pay of £5,318.77, and a further £1,329.69 under s93 ERA 1996 for failure to give written reasons for dismissal.
The claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed because he accepted that the holiday year ran with the school year and he had been dismissed at the beginning of September, leaving no holiday entitlement to pay out. The unpaid wages and commission claim was also dismissed because the commission entitlement was not clearly calculated and the burden of proof remained on the claimant. The order records a total of £12,099.92, although the itemised awards in the judgment sum to £13,296.92.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded after the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £5,319 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a compensatory award of two weeks' pay; I have treated this as the unfair dismissal element. No separate basic award is set out, apparently because a redundancy payment was also ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,330 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was ordered at eight weeks' pay on the same weekly rate used for the redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £5,319 |
| Other | Award under s93 ERA 1996 for failure to give written reasons for dismissal. | Upheld | — | £1,330 |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the claimant accepted that the holiday year ran with the school year and he was dismissed at the beginning of September. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the commission claim was not clearly calculated and entitlement to commission was not proved on the evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,100
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,330
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.92 ERA 1996
- s.93 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.