Case 1406585/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Ramsay (Director of Respondent) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406585/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing on 2 September 2021, Employment Judge Gray dealt with a preliminary issue in the claim brought by Mr P Erskine against Weston Communications Ltd. The parties were represented by Mr Erskine in person and Ms Ramsay for the respondent.
By consent, the tribunal determined that Mr Erskine was a worker of Weston Communications Ltd within the meaning of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also determined, again by consent, that he was owed wages and holiday pay.
The judgment did not fix the amount of those wages or holiday pay. It recorded that quantum remained to be determined at a later stage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal determined by consent that the claimant was a worker within the meaning of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and was owed wages; the amount remained to be determined. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal determined by consent that the claimant was a worker within the meaning of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and was owed holiday pay; the amount remained to be determined. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.