Case 1406608/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S J Ellis v Clayesmore School Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406608/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lowe Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S J Ellis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 14 January 2022, the tribunal determined whether Mrs Ellis was a disabled person under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period of 31 January 2020 to 16 October 2020. It accepted that she experienced symptoms including lack of concentration, memory difficulties, disrupted sleep, tiredness, low mood and agitation, and found that the cumulative impact amounted to a mental impairment.
The tribunal also found that the impairment had an adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities and that the effect was substantial. It relied on evidence that household tasks became difficult, routine matters were forgotten or left incomplete, social activities were avoided, and the claimant became more reliant on her husband, with the tribunal treating those effects as more than minor or trivial.
The claim failed on the long-term element. The tribunal noted there was no formal medical prognosis that the effects would last 12 months, relied on the claimant's evidence that her condition improved from June 2020 and that she felt ready to return on a phased basis, and accepted Dr Jigau's occupational health opinion of 14 September 2020 that there was good recovery, no need for regular medication, and no clear persistent impact on daily activities. It concluded that the effects were not likely to last beyond 12 months, so Mrs Ellis was not disabled for the purposes of the Act and the Equality Act 2010 claims were dismissed. The unfair dismissal claim was listed for a further case management hearing and was not determined at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue on disability status under section 6 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found the claimant had a mental impairment with adverse and substantial effects, but not a long-term effect, so she was not a disabled person at the relevant time and the Equality Act 2010 claims were dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v The Patent Office four questions
- Richmond Adult Community College v McDougall
- Boyle v SCA Packaging 'could well happen'
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.