Case 1406714/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Holt v Trios Facilities Management — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406714/2020
- Decision date
- 7 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Holt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a judgment by consent in Mr A Holt's unfair dismissal claim against Trios Facilities Management Limited. Employment Judge Gray stated that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and that he had been procedurally unfairly dismissed.
The remedy was also agreed by consent. The tribunal recorded that no basic award was due and that the compensatory award was £2,161.52, made up of four weeks' net pay at £415.38 and £500 for loss of statutory employment rights.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment by consent recorded that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and that the claimant had been procedurally unfairly dismissed. The compensatory award was agreed at £2,161.52; no basic award was due. | Upheld | — | £2,162 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,162
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,162
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.