Case 1600001/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M. Davies-Brown v Family Friends (formerly Family Friends for 5’s to 11’s) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600001/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M. Davies-Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M. Davies-Brown’s employment ended on 10 August 2018. The tribunal found that early conciliation with ACAS commenced on 9 November 2018 and that the early conciliation certificate issued on 26 November 2018 extended the presentation deadline to 26 December 2018. The claimant presented claims of unfair dismissal and sex discrimination on 2 January 2019, which was out of time.
For the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal applied section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and considered whether it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. It found that the claimant had adduced no evidence showing why the claim was not presented by 26 December 2018 or within a reasonable time after that date.
For the sex discrimination claim, the tribunal applied section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 and considered whether it would be just and equitable to extend time. It found that the claimant had provided no evidence on which that discretion could be exercised. The tribunal therefore dismissed both claims for non-compliance with the statutory time limits and said it did not have jurisdiction to consider them.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented on 2 January 2019 after the extended deadline of 26 December 2018; the tribunal found no evidence that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time or within a reasonable time after expiry. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Presented on 2 January 2019 after the extended deadline of 26 December 2018; the tribunal found no material on which to exercise the just and equitable discretion to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.