Case 1600002/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Hegarty v AND Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600002/2019
- Decision date
- 1 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Hegarty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Hegarty brought an unfair dismissal claim against Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited. At Cardiff on 1 May 2019, Employment Judge Beard noted that no ET3 response form had been presented by the respondent and that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to determine the claim. The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim.
The judgment awarded a basic award of £1,297.50. The compensatory award was made up of £1,297.50 for notice pay, £450.00 for loss of statutory rights, £4,800.75 for loss of earnings, and £3,373.50 for future loss, producing a total award of £11,219.25.
The annex to the judgment recorded a prescribed element of £4,800.75 for the period 16 August 2018 to 1 May 2019 and an excess of £6,418.50 payable forthwith under the recoupment provisions. The judgment also stated that the claimant is responsible for any tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay, although no separate wage or holiday pay claim was recorded in the disposition.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim in the absence of an ET3 response from the respondent and made a monetary award under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £11,219 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,219
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,298
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,922
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.