Case 1600004/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Al-Azzani v Ummel Umineen Academy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600004/2020
- Decision date
- 23 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Al-Azzani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge G Duncan heard the case in Cardiff on 16 May 2022. The respondent accepted that it had made an unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £100, and the tribunal recorded that it had tried to pay that amount in March 2020 by sending a cheque to the claimant. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant did not bank the cheque within six months and did not tell the respondent it had become void until shortly before the full hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent accepted that it had made an unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £100 and that it had attempted to pay the outstanding amount in March 2020 by cheque. The claimant did not present the cheque within six months and did not tell the respondent it had become void until shortly before the full hearing. | Upheld | — | £100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.