Case 1600004/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R John v Dvla — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600004/2023
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R John
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 June 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr R John an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 20 April 2023 and 25 April 2023, and that the case had not been actively pursued.
Mr John did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations explaining why strike out should not follow, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R Harfield ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment contains no merits findings on any substantive employment claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action; it states only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders dated 20 April 2023 and 25 April 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.