Case 1600008/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Erica Street v Got Beef Canton Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1600008/2018
- Decision date
- 1 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Erica Street
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued judgment in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent. Employment Judge S Davies said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to enable a proper determination, and the claim was determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claims for unpaid wages of £1,131.70, one week’s notice pay of £288.75, and unpaid holiday pay of £590.00. The judgment does not set out further factual findings or any contested defence, because the respondent did not file a response.
The tribunal also stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,132 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as 1 week’s notice pay. | Upheld | — | £289 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £590 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,010
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.