Case 1600008/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr EE Inyang v Enzen Global Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600008/2020
- Decision date
- 1 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr EE Inyang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a withdrawal judgment under rule 52. The judgment records that the proceedings in case 1600008/2020 were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. The order is dated 23 March 2020 and was sent to the parties on 1 April 2020.
No findings were made on liability or remedy. On the information in the case listing, the underlying claims were breach of contract, race discrimination and unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself does not determine any of those claims on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim; the judgment records no merits findings or remedy. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim; the judgment records no merits findings or remedy. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim; the judgment records no merits findings or remedy. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.