Case 1600018/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L. V. Jones (C1) Mrs A. D. Owen (C2) v Kingdom Services Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600018/2021
- Decision date
- 20 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L. V. Jones (C1) Mrs A. D. Owen (C2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that each claimant had originally worked 10 hours per week at Coleg Menai, but that in December 2018 the respondent's line manager offered and the claimants accepted an increase to 21.5 contracted hours per week from January 2019, or alternatively a second afternoon cleaning role of 11.5 hours per week. The tribunal accepted the claimants' evidence that the additional hours were agreed as contracted hours, not overtime.
The tribunal found that the respondent paid salary, holiday entitlement and furlough pay on the basis of 21.5 hours per week until September 2020. It also distinguished the claimants' October 2019 overtime, which was separately recorded and paid as overtime, from the regular afternoon hours.
The tribunal found that from September 2020 the respondent unilaterally reduced pay to 10 hours per week by misdescribing the afternoon hours as overtime. The deductions were not authorised by statute, by a written contractual term, or by written agreement, and each claimant was owed £6,728.42 gross for the disputed 11.5 hours per week over the claim period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared unauthorised deductions from each claimant's wages and awarded £6,728.42 gross to each claimant, subject to usual statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £13,457 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,457
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.