Case 1600025/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Cutlan v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600025/2022
- Decision date
- 22 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Cutlan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 10 January 2023 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint based on the making of a public interest disclosure should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint based on the making of a public interest disclosure. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining ordinary unfair dismissal claim was unaffected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The complaints of detriment and/or unfair dismissal based on the making of a public interest disclosure were struck out. The claimant's remaining claim of ordinary unfair dismissal was expressly unaffected and was not determined in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.