Case 1600025/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Dr S Matthews v Greencoat Limited and 1 other — 2024

Case reference: 1600025/2024
Decision date: 21 February 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Howden-Evans Representation
Venue: Cardiff

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Dr S Matthews

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The hearing took place at Cardiff on 24 January 2024 before Employment Judge Howden-Evans, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondents represented by counsel. The written record states that the tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.

The only adjudicated matter recorded in the judgment is the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996. That application was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the written record does not set out further factual findings or reasoning beyond the dismissal of the interim relief application.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment records that the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996 was unsuccessful and dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.