Case 1600037/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mr D Jones and Mr G Jones, a partnership T/a D Jones and Son — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600037/2018
- Decision date
- 8 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr G Williams was unfairly dismissed by the respondent on 16 December 2018. It held that he had already received his statutory redundancy payment, so he was not entitled to a basic award. It also found that, had the respondent acted fairly, the claimant would still have been dismissed on 16 December 2018, so it was not just and equitable to make a compensatory award.
The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed upon withdrawal, and the claim for notice pay was also dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal dismissed the claim for unlawful deductions from wages, which related to one week's pay.
The tribunal further held that the protected award claim was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay compensation to those employees who were employed on 16 December 2018 and had not entered into a settlement agreement by the date of judgment, in a sum equivalent to sixty days' pay. The separate claim for failure to provide particulars of the claimant's terms and conditions of employment was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment; the tribunal recorded it as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for notice pay; the tribunal recorded it as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant on 16 December 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Protected award claim found well founded; compensation ordered to eligible employees at a sum equivalent to sixty days' pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of one week's pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide particulars of the claimant's terms and conditions of employment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.